Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Review of KYMCO's 2008 ATV, UTV Lineup

!±8± Review of KYMCO's 2008 ATV, UTV Lineup

Anyone doubting KYMCO's committment to the off-road powersports market only needs to peruse the company's fast-growing lineup.

KYMCO has steadily refined its all-terrain products and broadened its offerings with each model year. The Taiwanese company's recent efforts included the so-so MXU 500 utility quad for 2007 and revamped 2008 Mongoose 250 and 300 sport quads.

This time around, KYMCO is getting even bolder, and has arrived at the table with the highly anticipated UXV 500 UTV and all-new MXU 375 utility ATV.

We recently traveled to the backyard of the company's US division, scenic South Carolina, to ride KYMCO's full line of 2008 products, and also spent some time behind the wheel of its first-ever UTV. At this point, one thing is for sure: KYMCO is taking notes and making serious strides to match its American and Japanese competitors in style, performance and product offerings.

Setting The Table
The setting was Carolina Adventure World, a still growing privately-owned off-road riding area with more than 100 miles of trails, a mud bog and three motocross tracks. We've ridden there before while visiting for Polaris and Kawasaki intros, and, just like KYMCO, the facility keeps getting better as it continues to mature.

Temperatures could have been a bit more spring-like, but skies were clear, the grass was green and conditions were ripe for some mud-splattered off-roading.

UXV Is UTV
Yamaha, Polaris, Arctic Cat and Kawasaki have their big-selling recreational side-by-side players in place. Honda's more work-minded Big Red is on the way soon, and Can-Am recently announced plans for what we expect to be a very athletic (RZR beating?) UTV. There had also been speculation KYMCO was readying its own entrant into the exploding category. Those rumors were confirmed after the company took the wraps off its new UXV 500 at the EICMA powersports show in Milan, Italy, last fall.

Then we got to see it for ourselves. Going off appearance alone, it seems the company had the Rhino, Teryx and Prowler firmly in its sights. Its traditional UTV design suggests a machine meant to split the difference between work and fun, just like the most successful players in the segment.

The spec sheet lists a 500cc four-stroke engine, independent suspension, locking front differential and a large tilting cargo bed capable of hauling 420 pounds - the main ingredients we call for when making a UTV.
Pricing had not been finalized at press time and a few minor specifications on the prototypes were still subject to change before final production.

Behind The Wheel
Time was limited, but we got the chance to experience KYMCO's UTV from the driver and passenger seats, as well as through thick mud, over steep hills and fording it through deep water.

We didn't get the chance to haul any cargo around, but our ride time gave us the much-appreciated chance to peek under the hood and rack up some miles with the UXV.

Lateral stability (i.e. rolling over) has been a thorn in the side of several UTVs. To this end, KYMCO decided to up the ante with a wide, stable platform that measures 59 inches wide. For comparison's sake, the Prowler is 61.3 inches wide and the Rhino measures 54.5 inches across.

The extra girth translated to flat, predictable handling that's more reassuring than some of the narrower competitors in high-speed corners. It made winding through the riding park's tight woods trails somewhat more challenging, though, and will also make it tricky to shoehorn the UXV into the back of a pickup truck.

Like the new Teryx, EFI wasn't included - obvious cost-cutting to help KYMCO compete on price and rush its model to the market. Without any need for the dash-mounted choke, our warmed-up UXV fired up quickly.

Stepping into the throttle, the liquid-cooled 500cc DOHC four-stroke felt moderately taxed by the 1,157-pound (dry) weight, but the power was enough to surmount steep hills and power the big guy through some impressive mud holes.
A little vibration was present, but engine refinement is in line with the bulk of the sport utility segment. The exhaust note sounds more agricultural than sporty, another common trait shared with nearly every other side-by-side.

It's all business inside the cabin with frills kept to a minimum. A center-mounted gauge cluster displays all the usual information, and the shifter is mounted on the center console between the seats. Shift action was spotty, as reverse gear didn't always engage when the lever was moved to "R." Hopefully this can be cleared up before final production.

Seating accommodations are right on the money with enough side bolstering to keep the riders in place. Foot room and dash positioning is also on target - definitely better than a few of its competitors.

Top speed is estimated at 45 mph - ideal for a vehicle of this size and purpose.

Suspension is a dual A-arm design that provides 7.5 inches of travel at both ends and 12.2 inches of ground clearance. The transmission includes high and low ranges, and also includes a differential lock. Stopping action comes from two discs in the front and a single disc brake in the rear.

The tilting cargo bed is large enough to handle full-size loads up to 420 pounds, and the tailgate has a simple latching system just like the Rhino's.
Our brief ride revealed a competent work vehicle that should have plenty of playtime capability. Pricing is still not finalized, but we expect it to undercut the competition by some measure. Time will tell. The UXV 500 4x4 will be available in red, green, gray and camo, with a 1-year factory warranty.
MXU 375

Our Carolina adventure also included time on prototypes for KYMCO's newest utility quad - the MXU 375.

After being underwhelmed by the company's last utility entrant, the MXU 500, we were pleasantly surprised by a competent package this time around. However, just like the 500, the MXU 375's sketchy front-end handling traits are a disappointment for aggressive trail riding.

Styling and build quality are solid, with competitive features and smart design that prove this company is fully in the running with its North American and Japanese competitors. Even with the chassis' occasionally unsettled front end, it remains a no-excuses mid-displacement utility quad.

While company officials won't confirm it, the new MXU's engine is shared with Arctic Cat's new 366 4x4 utility, and the base platform for the two models are eerily similar. We think the KYMCO version is the better looking twin. Its engine, a 366cc four-stroke, is adequately potent and smooth, a perfect match for its intended purpose.

As mentioned, handling was a mixed bag, and different machines on-hand had different configurations. The front-end handling is just as unstable as it is on the Arctic Cat variant over undulating ground - too much body roll, and steering that is easily thrown off-kilter.

The performance of the carbureted and fan-cooled engine is much better - smooth, with a refined exhaust note and torquey power delivery.

A few features on our test mules, like turn signals and hazard flashers, won't be making it to the final U.S. version and company engineers are still tweaking the final braking setup.

The main stats will see production unchanged - dual A-arm front and rear suspension (7 inches of travel), a CVT with high and low gears, and disc braking in front and out back.

When it comes to work credentials, the little MXU can strap 225 pounds to its racks, and tow 1,050 pounds in its wake.

This new 375 will make a solid competitor in the entry-level class, with a great engine leading the way. Like a few other manufacturers whose products share similar handling traits, KYMCO needs to focus its efforts on building vehicles that keep their composure around corners and uneven terrain. Its competent engine and attractive styling suggest a utility quad that has some sporty genes in its DNA. That's not really the case, but it's not far off the mark.

A Fresh Goose

Our previous evaluation of the new-and-improved Mongoose 300 at last fall's ATV Trials event showed a meaningful roster of changes that massaged the company's entry-level CVT sport quad into something more desirable than the original.

KYMCO added a (much-needed) sturdier chain and a larger carburetor, stretched the wheelbase with a longer swingarm, widened the track by a whopping five inches and softened up the overly-stiff front end with progressive rate springs.

In our latest test, the 'Goose tore through the tight trails of Carolina Adventure World with eagerness and balance. The CVT provided surprisingly snappy throttle response - more aggressive than expected. Listening to riders, taking notes and constantly evolving has served the company and its products well.

Power from the liquid-cooled 270cc engine could still be stronger, especially at the top end, but powertrain vibration wasn't an issue, so it's happy being pushed hard. Body roll is kept in check and the progressive rate springs produce a ride that's much more comfortable than the '07 model. The changes are especially noticeable over harsh trails.

A CVT tranny in a sport quad is still fairly uncommon, but was well-suited to the tight, winding trails we rode. Spunky performance, solid handling and a affordable sub-,800 price make this entry-level quad a smart choice for sport riders looking for the ease of a CVT.

While we didn't get the opportunity to ride it, the updates made to the '08 Mongoose 300 were also applied to the 250.

This pair of Mongooses (Mongeese?) is now up there with the best machines in the class.


Review of KYMCO's 2008 ATV, UTV Lineup

Purchase Brother Tn350

Thursday, August 11, 2011

2009 Polaris Sportsman XP models

!±8± 2009 Polaris Sportsman XP models

There is a question surprisingly similar to buyers in the market for a middle-of-the-road quad Polaris Utility. With offers only $ 400 difference in price between two strong competitors in the middle of the turn Polaris ATV, the bang for the buck? Candidate A, the Sportsman 400 HO, rides on a newer platform (see the change), while candidate B, the Sportsman 500 HO Quad Token Utility company and one of the best-selling ATV of all time (see experience).

MeetCandidates
How should one decide? Polaris is a convincing argument for the middle class SPORTSMAN 400 HO and its full-size model 500 HO - the 400 is an entry level model with features of Big Boy, while the full-size 500 has a larger engine and a small punishment price increases. With such a narrow difference in fiscal policy (price pseudonym), the choice seems pretty insignificant.

As you dig to see the details, but there are some significant differences that need to be off the air -that is, as the 400 laps of the truth and in fact a 455cc single-cylinder packs by the late Sportsman 450, while 500 met expectations with a 499cc unit served for a decade. As for the dry weight, obesity, an important issue, and all, there is a 91-pound advantage over £ 696 scale 400-605

The pass also offers a strong contrast. The 400 is 4.5 inches shorter than the 500 for a package more manageable for less experienced riders, or loadingin a crowded toy tractor. Let's not get bogged down in conflict - there are many similarities here. Both platforms have the carburetor and cooling liquid are, front McPherson suspension and return from the IRS, vital statistics show a complete instrumentation and share power with the firm selected "true" on-demand four-wheel drive. Sounds even-Steven, but we are nowhere close to naming leaders.

The first debate
It was time for some personal conversations, a realknock-down drag-out debate. Forget Iowa, New Hampshire or the Carolinas, we are here to ATV Magazine and outdoorsmen headed for the snowy slopes of northwest Wisconsin, the candidates head to head well.

Just 30 seconds into our trip, and with only 2 miles on the odometer, we noticed the all-wheel-drive not engage on the 400 we were able to diagnose the problem yourself. A debate lasting a few hours before it was potentially serious character flaw increases with the redCandidates.

Although our goal was covered with snow and slippery 4WD was not necessary and we continued along the hilly, picturesque woodland paths. Off between the two was a clear disparity in the performance balance. Our riding 500 Polaris 500 HO is like so many before - soft. Shocks are absorbed to the point of elimination, one for the hard work without experience. Credit cards, which are abundant on the front and 9.5 inches 8.2 500 Travel and rear, compared to seven eightThe acceleration to 400 is moderate, the body roll is not a problem, the controls are where they expect and it feels like a real full-size car.

Battered but still fighting, drove along the 400, it was like the underdog - lighter and less bulky. Two testers, and bigger, and felt comfortable riding on the thumbnail and appreciate its tossability. The four-beit still offers that comfortable around Polaris trademark, but is firmer damping rates, different suspensionGeometry or the shorter wheelbase, there is less comfort. Instead, drivers will receive a more sporty feel than the 500 Lower fender and the width of three inches less for the 400 new, smaller, playful feel of an unladen weight forward.
This round is a tie.

The power to change
The search for a clear winner is easier when it comes to performance and speed. Polaris says the mill produces 500 hp peak 35.9 and 31.1 pound-feet of torque at 5000 rpm, while maximum power of 400 is 29.2 and 24.6Pound-feet of torque rises to recover.

It is put on the weight difference, though, and for this reason, we have the radar gun and has some acceleration tests - never kill a bad way to get some time on a lonely country road.

Less weight and smaller size were not sufficient for the 400, drive faster than 500 has been revised. It took 101 feet to 400 to hit 30 mph, while the 500 is the same operation in less than 90 meters. After several miles on it,and often switch between computers, the numbers were a surprise. They are both very close, and the other may depend on trails, but the 500 wins the gear selector.

Kitchen Table Issues

More time with the candidates has led some of the finer points of dispute - issues of power, strength and tone.

On paper, there is nothing different brake packages with the duo. Both offers single-lever hydraulic front disc brake and a hydraulic rear foot -Traditional lever brakes. But then look at the current record. Brakes our 400 was significantly pre-loaded, perceived by almost all the braking force sent to the front wheels. Behind the slippery corners, it was enough to send the car understeer moment. Brakes on the 500, however, is a model of consistency - just what you expect when you expect it, and without the front-heavy distortion.

Ergonomics is another field of battle for any consumer Cross Shoppingthese two. When our testers were both above the barrier of 6 meters, we were surprised to feel comfortable with them. The trimmer 400 felt like a 9/10ths scale developed for small quad riders, but is still roomy enough to appeal to the masses.

With all things being equal, it may sound, vibration and harshness make a big difference to the fickle buyers. Why you should train with less if someone else is annoying? To this end, single-cylinder engine is not all that high-tech or polished.Since this is a debate that eventually we would be remiss if it did not give it to you directly - the old 500 vibrates less, a tribute to years of aging. While the 400 is not difficult, there is more engine and chassis vibrations, which makes the driver. There is no landslide here, but the Sportsman 500 is the smooth operator.

Wedge Issues

Moving beyond the big-ticket issues, it is worth mentioning a few minor differences. You never know what a deal breaker with annoying problemVoters. First, while most full-size features has the 500, the 400 has no low range or parking gear.

If you purchase a Polaris Sportsman, probably excited about the tank under the front rack - we love the function and use it at every opportunity you get. A small room, combined with service access to the radiator and plug the battery charger caused a small cubby on the E 400 'of usable storage capacity yet, but I HAVE 500 buyers can more than a pack of ratsbefore and you get an additional stowage compartment under the luggage rack.

The instrumentation is another area that shows some minor cost reductions on the 400 - to digital indicators are not as readable as analog and digital display on the 500 There is also a pod 500 on the light Hey, this is a campaign, and each little detail counts.

Damage Control

As the sun went down and the road to a dead end, it was time to turn around and get back on track. We gave everything we hadPowerslide for a full return journey and I tried to make the final call on these two contrasting races. The truck is always a good place to think.

Back in business, we decided to dig up some answers to the 400 4WD system is defective. Polaris after service technicians poked, prodded and told us that a ring either spontaneously from his pen in the case of main landing gear, or was ever to sit on the assembly line. When the current was transmitted through, it is pushed against the retaining ring until the pinionSnorkeling equipment on the tree was no longer the contact - so no front wheel into action.

Definitely a problem is necessarily given in a harsh light by the media. Not so! ATV Magazine has a glorious history of objective reporting. These problems are rare transmission closely for any mainstream manufacturer, and we will take him at one time mistake.

Election Day

The attempt to block a winner, treated in the media the same old questions. Who is the ideal buyer for the smaller 400? Who should gowith the larger 500? There is enough difference between them? And we'd go to testers, if we had to ask the question for you?

Our vote? The Sportsman 500 HO, for its size, super-soft ride, low range, more speed, more torque, and the fact that a Sportsman 500 has never been as low as low. If you work or play, and we both like, there are many reasons given to justify the extra $ 400. Store to carry more equipment, more ass, take more stuff.

On the contrary,maybe not the great compromise for those who appreciate a simple operation, more manageable size and less weight Sportsman 400 HO There may be more important than any other feature to offer quad in its class.

What is right for you? This is your call. But if you like and we are looking for a full-sized workers and a pilot run lively brand of voting for the 500 Sportsman HO


2009 Polaris Sportsman XP models

Purchasing Stihl Chainsaw Bars Last Minute Hoover F5914


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。







Sponsor Links